Legal Opinion

Viking Construction, Inc. v. Hayden Lake Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2010No. 36231-2009PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment upholding an increase in a connection fee charged as an “equity buy-in” to hook up to a domestic water system in an irrigation district. Because there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the connection fee was calculated as the value of that portion of the system capacity that the new user will utilize at that point in time, we vacate the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Hayden Lake Irrigation District (Irrigation District) is an irrigation district that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rim View Trout Co. v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alliance for Property Rights & Fiscal Responsibility v. City of Idaho FallsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Bremer, LLC v. East Greenacres Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Hill-Vu Mobile Home Park v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API