Legal Opinion

Alliance for Property Rights & Fiscal Responsibility v. City of Idaho Falls

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 2013No. 12-35800PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Municipalities in Idaho do not have the power to exercise eminent domain extra-territorially for the purpose of constructing electric transmission lines. Neither the Idaho Constitution nor the Idaho Legislature has expressly or impliedly given Idaho’s cities that power. Because cities in Idaho are “creature[s] of the state,” they cannot receive that power from any other source. Caesar v. State, 101 Idaho 158, 610 P.2d 517, 519 (1980). Because the City of Idaho Falls need only provide electric power at its lowest possible cost (whatever that cost may be), it…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Thompson v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Local 1494 of the International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Oswalt v. RESOLUTE INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Helen Armstrong v. Terry ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Brandon Hodges v. Comcast Cable CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. William Platt v. Jason MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Fortino Alvarez v. Randy TracyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. John Sinibaldi v. Redbox Automated RetailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API