Legal Opinion

United States v. Rehak

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 22, 2009No. 09-1405, 09-1406PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

After a jury trial in district court, 1 Timothy Conrad Rehak and Mark Paul Naylon were convicted of conspiring to violate civil rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241, and theft of government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641. They appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

I

In 2004, Timothy Rehak, a law enforcement officer, and Mark Naylon, a public information officer, were working for the Special Investigations Unit of the Ramsey County Sheriffs Office (RCSO). In September, the FBI began investigating Re-hak for corruption. On November 3, it conducted…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. JefferyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. DowlCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API