Legal Opinion
Samson v. DiConzo
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 17, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Julia Samson appeals from the dismissal in the Superior Court (Oxford County, McKinley, AR.J.) of her complaint against her employers, John and Priscilla DiConzo. She contends that the court erred in holding that the exclusivity provisions of the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act, 39-A M.R.S.A. §§ 104 and 408 (Supp.1994), preclude the maintenance of an action pursuant to the Maine Liquor Liability Act, 28-A M.R.S.A. §§ 2501-2520 (Liquor Act), against the DiConzos. She further contends that the court erred in rejecting the “dual persona doctrine” as an alternative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klingerman v. SOL Corp. of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- McKellar v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- LaBelle v. CrepeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Li v. C.N. Brown Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Currier v. McKeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tatum v. Medical University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Tatum v. Medical University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001