Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Hunt

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1934No. Civil No. 3338PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action brought by B. D. Proctor, hereinafter called plaintiff, against George W. P. Hunt, Mit Simms and Ana Frohmiller, at the time of filing this action being Governor, treasurer and auditor of the state of Arizona, whom we shall designate hereafter by the titles of their offices, under the provisions of section 105, Revised Code 1928, which reads as follows:

“§105. Officers and persons liable. Whenever any person whose duty it is to approve, audit, allow, or pay, claims or demands upon the state, shall approve, audit, allow or pay or consent to, or connive at, the approving,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callaghan v. BoyceArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fairfield v. W. J. Corbett Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Turken v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Town of Gila Bend v. Walled Lake Door CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Austin v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Board of Regents of University & State Colleges v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API