Austin v. Campbell
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.
This is a taxpayer’s action to recover for the State of Arizona certain expense reimbursements audited, paid out and received pursuant to a statute later held unconstitutional by this court in Giss v. Jordan, 82 Ariz. 152, 309 P.2d 779 (1957). From a summary judgment for plaintiff Campbell, defendants Jewel W. Jordan, auditor for the State of Arizona, and thirteen members of the Twenty-second Legislature have appealed.
Since 1947 Arizona legislators have been reimbursed for necessary expenses in*197curred during sessions of the legislature.1 But prior to 1956 amounts so…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Wichita County v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Downs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- State v. KrugArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- McKinley v. ReillyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.