Legal Opinion

Austin v. Campbell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1962No. 6691PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s action to recover for the State of Arizona certain expense reimbursements audited, paid out and received pursuant to a statute later held unconstitutional by this court in Giss v. Jordan, 82 Ariz. 152, 309 P.2d 779 (1957). From a summary judgment for plaintiff Campbell, defendants Jewel W. Jordan, auditor for the State of Arizona, and thirteen members of the Twenty-second Legislature have appealed.

Since 1947 Arizona legislators have been reimbursed for necessary expenses in*197curred during sessions of the legislature.1 But prior to 1956 amounts so…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Wichita County v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Downs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. State v. KrugArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. McKinley v. ReillyArizona Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API