Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Hargens

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1957No. File 9587Published

1Opinion of the Court

81 N.W.2d 888 (1957)

Phyllis HINKLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

C. W. HARGENS, M. D., Defendant and Respondent.

No. 9587.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

March 21, 1957.

Parnell J. Donohue, Bonesteel, for plaintiff and appellant.

H. M. Lewis, Hot Springs, for defendant and respondent.

HANSON, Judge.

This is a malpractice action for damages. The complaint alleges the defendant surgeon left a portion of a surgical needle embedded in plaintiff's back following an operation performed on September 15, 1932; that defendant negligently failed to remove the needle fragment and fraudulently concealed such fact;…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. District Township of Boomer v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Lindquist v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hinkle v. HargensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Faust v. HosfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API