Legal Opinion

State v. Waterbury

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1981No. J79-2319, CA 18002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J. PRO TEMPORE

Defendant was found guilty of manufacturing marijuana. Prior to trial, he moved to suppress evidence seized under a search warrant and also for an order to compel the state to disclose the name of a confidential informer and to compel his appearance at the motion to suppress hearing. The trial court denied both motions. Two issues are raised by this appeal: first, whether the state is required to disclose the identity of an informant where the informant’s testimony is relevant only to the question of substantial official involvement in the informant’s private search…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SinesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. WymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. BrittenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API