Legal Opinion
State v. Wyman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 29, 1982No. 81-355 C, CA A22933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
The state appeals, pursuant to ORS 138.060(3), from a pretrial order suppressing certain evidence that was held to be the product of an unreasonable search and seizure. We reverse.
On September 16, 1981, Klamath Falls police officers were dispatched to defendant’s home to investigate a report of a domestic disturbance. When the officers arrived, defendant’s girlfriend, Ms. Godsby, was there, but not defendant. The officers learned that Ms. Godsby had been living at the house but had recently moved out. After a few minutes, defendant arrived at the house. The officers explained their presence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. RohrbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.