Legal Opinion
Colindres v. Quietflex Manufacturing
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 31, 2006No. CIV.A. H-01-4319, CIV.A. H-01-4323PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, seventy-eight Latino employees and former employees of QuietFlex, assert claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 203, et seq. 1 Defendants argue that none of the plaintiffs has specific evidence to show that he was not properly compensated under the FLSA. (Docket Entry No. 218 at 46). Defendants move for partial summary judgment dismissing the FLSA claims asserted by the seventy-eight individual plaintiffs. 2 These plaintiffs have responded and cross-moved for partial summary judgment that they were deprived…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garner v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Alston v. DIRECTV, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Johnson v. RGIS Inventory SpecialistsDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
- ZIRINTUSA v. WhitakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Mohammadi v. NwabuisiDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.