Moore v. Owens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Appellants have two assignments of error: One, the court committed error in refusing to charge the jury as a matter of law, to answer all the issues in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, Two, the court committed error in charging the jury peremptorily to answer the first and third issues No. These two assignments of error are not supported by any exception anywhere in the record, not even under the assignments of error. Plaintiffs tendered to the court no prayer for instructions.
This Court has universally held that an assignment of error not supported by an exception is ineffectual.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Rigsbee v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sigmund Sternberger Foundation, Inc. v. TannenbaumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State Highway Commission v. LA REYNOLDS COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Company v. BuchanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Paschal v. AutrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.