Legal Opinion

Paschal v. Autry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1962No. 598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendants’ assignments of error are not supported by any exceptions, except in the assignments of error. We allowed their motion to “group the exceptions to the assignments of error,” but even now their assignments of error are not supported by any exceptions, except in the assignments of error.

The judgment of Judge Clark confirming the referee’s report awards damages for plaintiffs against defendant David McKay for the wrongful cutting and removal of timber from the lands described in the complaint, adjudicates the boundaries and the location on the premises of the lands of the heirs of L.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. HeissIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Mast v. Sapp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Den Ex Dem. Ferebee v. ProcterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Strong v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API