Smith v. Tripp
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Assumpsit. On demurrer to the plea.
1Opinion of the CourtDureee, C. J.
This is assumpsit for the value of land formerly belonging to the plaintiff, takeil and held by the city of Providence for the use of its public water works. The declaration contains three counts. The first count alleges the taking of the land, on February 3, 1870, under Pub. Laws R. I. cap. 640, of March 8, 1866, entitled “ An Act for supplying the city of Providence with pure water,” “ by reason whereof,” it further alleges, “ said city of Providence became liable to pay the plaintiff a just compensation therefor; and in consideration thereof undertook and faithfully promised to pay him…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rexford v. . KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Calking v. BaldwinNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- McCormack v. Terre Haute & Richmond RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Kimble v. White Water Valley Canal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1849
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Umsted v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Root v. Providence Water Supply BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Connell v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
- State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021