Legal Opinion

Kimble v. White Water Valley Canal Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J. —

Trespass on the case. The declaration contains two counts. The first count alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of certain real estate in the county of Franklin, upon which are erected several mills supplied with water from the West Fork of the White Water river; and that the defendants erected a feeder-dam for their canal across said stream, and by means thereof diverted the water from Ms said mills, &c. ’ The second count is similar to the first, with the additional averment that the plaintiff, on the 1st day of February, 1845, filed Ms claim for damages in that behalf under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calking v. BaldwinNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Stowell v. FlaggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Baker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Johnston v. LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  4. Indianapolis & Madison Railroad v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Indiana Central Railway Co. v. OakesIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API