Legal Opinion

Giardino v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 28, 2007No. Civil Action 06-0469 (JMF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case has been referred to me by consent of the parties for all purposes, including trial.

I. PLAINTIFFS’CLAIMS

According to the amended complaint, the plaintiffs have sued the District of Columbia and the denominated defendants (Winston Robinson, Michael Anzallo, Jeffrey Parker, Mary Lanauze, and Thomas Boone) (the “individual defendants”), invoking Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; the “Human Rights Law of the District of Columbia,” D.C.Code § 2-1402.21(a); the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 US.C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Harris v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Kenneth M. Brown, Riggie A. Lott and All Other Inmates That Have Been Subject to the Conditions in the Adjustment Unit v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Harry M. Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harvey v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Harvey v. MohammedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API