Legal Opinion

Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. 94-0016PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Per curiam

We decide if a court of appeals may affirm a trial court judgment upholding a contested Public Utility Commission of Texas (“PUC”) ratemaking order on the sole ground that the appellant has not timely filed a statement of facts. See Tex.R.App.P. 54. We hold that the court of appeals erred by failing to iden*599tify and address issues that may be resolved without a statement of facts. See Tex. R.App.P. 50(a), 90(a). We also hold the court of appeals erred by refusing to take judicial notice of the published order of the PUC, which forms the basis for this appeal.

In an order dated October 23, 1991,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Segrest v. SegrestTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Public Utility Commission v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Dallas v. Moreau, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  5. Langdale v. VillamilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Freedom Communications, Inc. v. CoronadoTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Hendee v. Dewhurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Douglas v. American Title Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API