Legal Opinion

Cladek v. Shepard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion: Percy R. Kelly, Judge. Department 1. In the matter of the estate of James B. Leigh, deceased. Claim by Charles Cladek against Ephraim Shepard, administrator. From judgment for the claimant, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

1. For precisely the same reason announced in Nealan v. Ring, 98 Or. 490 (193 Pac. 199), we cannot examine this case, for want of a sufficient record. The certificate of the trial judge attached to the bill of exceptions refers to exhibits said to be attached thereto and made part thereof, and declares that the bill of exceptions contains a full and correct account of all proceedings had upon *177the trial of said cause, and all of the testimony produced upon said trial necessary to explain or illustrate the exceptions therein referred to; yet there are no exhibits whatever attached to the bill…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nealan v. RingOregon Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HelmerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Van Vlack v. Van VlackOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Murphy v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API