Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Powers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 14, 1987No. P-86-5-3; CA A43359PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.
Plaintiffs seek review of a judgment authorizing final distribution of the estate of Dorothy E. Hayes (testatrix), contending that the trial court misconstrued the residuary clause in heir will. We affirm.
Testatrix executed her will on April 14, 1975. After making several specific bequests and devises, the will provides:
“TENTH: All of the residue of my estate I devise to FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON, IN TRUST, upon the following terms and conditions and for the following uses and purposes, to-wit:
“A. I direct my trustee to pay to my son, DOUGLAS M. HAYES, one-half of the net income of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. HelmerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of CrohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Cladek v. ShepardOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Kistner v. HenningsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haskins v. GarrettColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993