Legal Opinion

Hertz v. Times-World Corporation

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 21, 2000No. Record 991282; Record 992677PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

I

In these consolidated appeals, we consider whether the writ of mandamus is an appropriate remedy to challenge juvenile and domestic relations district courts’ rulings that closed preliminary hearings to the public.

n.

The Honorable A. Burke Hertz, Judge Designate, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court of the County of Bedford v. Times-World Corporation, et al.

*603In November 1998, the Honorable A. Burke Hertz, Judge Designate of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court of the County of Bedford, conducted a joint preliminary hearing in the cases styled Commonwealth v. Randy…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Earley v. LandsidleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Richmond-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Richlands Medical Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Hylton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goldman v. LandsidleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. In Re Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. Davenport v. Little-BowserSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Cartwright v. Commonwealth Transportation Comm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  5. Umstattd v. Centex Homes, G.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API