Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Post War Public Works Review Board
California Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1945No. L. A. No. 19213; L. A. No. 19224; S. F. No. 17128PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The city of Los Angeles, the county of Los *103Angeles and the city of Oakland filed separate petitions for the writ of mandate to compel the respondent Post War Public Works Review Board to perforin its duties pursuant to chapter 47, Statutes of 1944, Fourth Extraordinary Session, approved June 20, 1944. They are deemed to be companion proceedings and are submitted on the petitions, the demurrers thereto, and the briefs of the parties.
The petitions present the question of the constitutionality of said act which is entitled: “An act making an appropriation FOR ALLOCATION TO CITIES, COUNTIES, AND…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- California Teachers Assn. v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Shean v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.