Link v. Mauz (In re Mauz)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.
This Adversary Proceeding was originally commenced as a non-dischargeability action. The Plaintiffs/Creditors have now moved to amend their Complaint to make certain technical amendments to Count I of the non-dischargeability Complaint. The Amended Complaint also contains a new Count II which raises objections to the Debtor/Defendant’s Chapter 7 discharge. For the reasons stated below, I will grant leave to file the Amended Complaint regarding Count I but deny leave to file Count II of the proposed Amended Complaint.
I. JURISDICTION
The Court has…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Morris Rosen, Debtor v. Karen E. Bezner, Trustee, Morris RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Glover v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- In Re Harmony Holdings, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re BresslerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Symonies v. Sobol (In re Sobol)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Banco Cooperativo de P.R. v. Herrera (In re Herrera)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2018
- Link v. Mauz (In re Mauz)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Brett Dolfi, Sr. and Brian Dolfi v. Candace Lynn DolfiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.