Cenal v. Ragunton
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
FOLEY, J.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Anatalia Cenal (Ana-talia) and Michael Cenal (Michael) (collectively, the Cenáis) appeal from the Judgment filed on February 3, 2003 in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (circuit court).1
On appeal, the Cenáis contend (1) the jury verdict was against the clear weight of the evidence and/or the jury misunderstood its charge; (2) the circuit court erred in not granting the Cenáis’ Motion for New Trial; (3) the circuit court erred when it did not permit the Cenáis to ask prospective jurors if the jurors had any interest or relationship to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Carr v. StrodeHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Takayama v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Roger Charter, Individually and as Assignee v. William J. Chleborad, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kobashigawa v. Silva.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013