Legal Opinion

Fibre Metal Products Co. v. Jackson Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 14, 1957No. 14488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, as owner of United States Letters Patents 2,205,741 and *9502,205,742 issued June 25, 1940, on the application of Frederick M. Bowers for an adjustable headband, filed complaint alleging that defendant has and continues to infringe said Letters Patents by making and selling adjustable headbands embodying the inventions disclosed therein without the consent of the plaintiff. An injunction against further infringement, an accounting of profits, treble damages, costs and attorney fees is sought by plaintiff.

Defendant denies infringement and alleges that both the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lodge & Shipley Co. v. Holstein & KappertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  2. West Shore Manufacturing Co. v. Wesson Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API