Legal Opinion
SOUTHERN BT & T. CO. v. Nineteen Hundred One C. Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 2, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 So.2d 865 (1955)
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Joe H. Adams, as Florida State Hotel Commissioner, and Richard W. Ervin, as Attorney General of the State of Florida, Appellants,
v.
NINETEEN HUNDRED ONE COLLINS CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.
November 2, 1955.
Rehearing Denied January 6, 1956.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., George E. Owen and John C. Reed, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Atkins, Carson & Wahl, Miami, E.W. Smith, John A. Boykin, Jr., and Graham W. George, Atlanta, Ga., for Southern Bell…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. VocelleSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Fay, U. S. Atty. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- McInerney v. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- King v. SeamonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Hosack v. YocumSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Merrill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Olcott v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County1968