Legal Opinion
Fay, U. S. Atty. v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 3, 1950No. 10364_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
On March 25, 1949, the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Baltimore City, Maryland, received a letter from the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, stating:
“This office is in possession of competent evidence that the following telephone number WArfield 5061, located at 4923 LaSalle Road, Avondale, Maryland, is being used to aid and abet in the violation of statutes prohibiting gambling in the District of Columbia. I, therefore, request that this telephone equipment be disconnected and that such telephone service be discontinued.”
The Company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Manhattan-Bronx Postal Union v. John A. Gronouski, Individually and as Postmaster General of the UnitedstatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.