Legal Opinion

Van Woerden v. Union Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1930No. 22310. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

The appellant, Union Improvement Company, a corporation, organized and existing by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington, is to all intents and purposes, in so far as this action is concerned, identical with its principal stockholder, John Lorentz, and was, prior to July 21, 1928, the owner of certain lands and personal property in Grant county, Washington, generally referred to in the testimony as the Dr. Brown farm. The respondent, Van Woerden, was at that time the owner of certain property referred to in the testimony as the Cherry Valley Stock Farm, consisting not only of the farm…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connecticut Investment Co. v. DemickWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Altabet v. Monroe Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Toston v. Utah Mortgage Loan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Gill v. StroufWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API