Legal Opinion

Smith, III v. Holland, Lp

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-2242Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DANIEL J. SMITH, III, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-2242 (TFH) HOLLAND LP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Daniel Smith was injured while working in a tunnel of the Washington, D.C. metro on October 6, 2013. He seeks to hold defendant Plasser American Corporation (“Plasser”) liable for the design and manufacture of the machine at the center of the accident—a mobile railway maintenance hub called a prime mover. Plasser has moved for summary judgment on Counts VIII-XI of the complaint—“strict liability of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. Talavera v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Stacy Alexander v. Casino Queen IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API