Legal Opinion

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Cormetech, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 10, 2016No. CASE NO. 5:14CV514Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

Kathleen B. Burke, United States Magistrate Judge

In December 2005, Plaintiff Babcock & Wilcox Company (“B&W”) obtained a contract from Kansas City Power & Light Company (“KCP&L”) to design and construct a Selective Catalyst Reduction (“SCR”) system to control emissions from one of KCP&L’s coal-burning power stations in La Cygne, Kansas. Complaint, Doc. 1, p. 3, ¶ 8. Thereafter, B&W issued a purchase order to Defendant Cormetech, Inc. (“Cormetech”) to obtain catalyst modules to be used in the SCR. Id. ¶¶ 7, 9-10. Cormetech guaranteed that the catalyst it supplied…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API