Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Cormetech, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
Kathleen B. Burke, United States Magistrate Judge
In December 2005, Plaintiff Babcock & Wilcox Company (“B&W”) obtained a contract from Kansas City Power & Light Company (“KCP&L”) to design and construct a Selective Catalyst Reduction (“SCR”) system to control emissions from one of KCP&L’s coal-burning power stations in La Cygne, Kansas. Complaint, Doc. 1, p. 3, ¶ 8. Thereafter, B&W issued a purchase order to Defendant Cormetech, Inc. (“Cormetech”) to obtain catalyst modules to be used in the SCR. Id. ¶¶ 7, 9-10. Cormetech guaranteed that the catalyst it supplied…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.