Legal Opinion
Crow Tribe of Indians v. Racicot
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 14, 1996No. 95-35407PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents a dispute between the Crow Tribe and the State of Montana over the use of mechanical slot machines on the Crow Indian Reservation. The district court granted summary judgment against the Crow Tribe’s claim that the Tribe may operate mechanical slot machines on their Reservation. We affirm.
Statement of the Case
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721, provides a comprehensive framework for regulating gaming on Indian land. The IGRA divides Indian gaming into three classes, each subject to varying degrees of tribal, state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Richard Leo Deorle v. Greg Rutherford, Butte County Deputy Sheriff Mick Grey, Butte County Sheriff County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Anthony Reed v. Doug LieuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- United States ex rel. Compton v. Midwest Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- McHugh v. United Service Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.