Legal Opinion

Andre Roman v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.; and Does 1 to 50, inclusive

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 11, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01955Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE ROMAN, an individual, Case No.: 25cv1955-GPC(DEB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 14 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.; and DOES 1 to 50, 15 [Dkt. No. 8.] inclusive, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 8.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and 20 Defendant replied. (Dkt. Nos. 10, 11.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court 21 GRANTS…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API