Legal Opinion
Thomson & McKinnon v. Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 25, 1967No. 67 Civ. 1423PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKEL, District Judge.
Thomson & McKinnon, a securities brokerage partnership, and Walter T. O’Hara, one of the firm’s general partners, brought this action against the Securities and Exchange Commission and its five members as individuals seeking to enjoin in part a pending investigation by that agency. The jurisdiction of this court is asserted to rest upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337; the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202; *12the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. S.C. §§ 702, 704-706; and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. With the filing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Westheimer v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Baum v. Harman International Industries, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021