Legal Opinion

City of Rocky River v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided April 4, 1973No. 902,939Published

1Opinion of the CourtMaeshall, J.

This action concerns itself with the threatened construction by the defendant, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (“CEI”), of a high voltage electric power line identified in this case and known as the ' ‘ Clague-Edgewater line. ’ ’

The defendant proposes to construct the Clague-Edge-water line along the Norfolk and Western Railroad right-of-way through present and planned residential, recrea*18tional and commercial areas of the plaintiff, city of Rocky River (“City”). The city of Rocky River is a predominantly residential community consisting of approximately four square miles in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of PainesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kessler v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Cincinnati Motor Transportation Ass'n v. City of Lincoln HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Miesz v. Village of Mayfield HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API