Kessler v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HURD, J:
These actions in equity have been appealed from the Court of Common Pleas to this court on questions of law and fact for trial de novo. Having two cases before us for consideration, for purposes of clarity and brevity, the parties herein are referred to as follows: Louis F. Kessler, et al., as Kessler, George Smith, et al., as Smith, and the Village of Glenwillow as the Village. Because the issues between the parties in the cases are substantially the same, both cases were ordered to be consolidated in the Court of Common Pleas for the purpose of trial. The trial resulted in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Meuser v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blundell v. City of West HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Hawkinson v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- In Re Appeal of TadlockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Koston v. Town of NewburghNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Masheter v. Mariemont, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.