Stuart White v. City of Watertown
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Kelly, J.
*63 *322 ¶1 Some adjoining landowners in the City of Watertown have a long-standing dispute over who must pay to construct and maintain partition fencing between their properties. This case, however, is not about the neighbors' dispute, at least not directly. It is instead about the mechanism by which that dispute is addressed. The Whites say the City of Watertown is responsible for conducting a statutorily-prescribed procedure for resolving fence-related disputes. The City of Watertown, on the other hand, says the statutes authorize only towns-not cities-to conduct such proceedings. For the reasons…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Richards v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- CED Properties, LLC v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- White v. City of WatertownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Tavodess MatthewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Abby Windows, LLC v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
- Andrew J. Kyllonen v. Artisan and Truckers Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
- Stuart White v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- United States Cellular Operating Company LLC v. Town of Fond du LacCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025