Legal Opinion

Richards v. Badger Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2008No. 2005AP2796PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1. We are asked to review a decision of the court of appeals that reversed the circuit court's decision,1 which concluded that the stipulated facts of this case present a "common scheme or plan" that invokes joint and several liability under Wis. Stat. § 895.045(2) (2005-06).2 We affirm the court of appeals.

¶ 2. We conclude as follows: (1) Wis. Stat. § 895.045(2) is the legislative codification of the concerted action theory of liability; (2) the damages in this case resulted from the consumption of beer to the point of intoxication and the subsequent decision to drive while intoxicated;…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SotoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API