White v. City of Watertown
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
LUNDSTEN, P.J.
Chapter 90 of the Wisconsin Statutes regulates partition fences on farming and grazing land as defined in the chapter. For ease of reading, we will frequently refer to farming and grazing land that is covered by Chapter 90 as "qualifying land."
¶ 2. Chapter 90 provides fencing specifications, requires adjoining landowners to share costs, and provides dispute-resolution procedures for these landowners. Chapter 90 makes clear that, when qualifying land is in a town, the town is responsible for administering and enforcing Chapter 90 in respect to the fencing. However, Chapter 90…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Noffke Ex Rel. Swenson v. BakkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Warehouse II, LLC v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stuart White v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Stuart White v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019