Legal Opinion

McCulley v. City of Princeton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1972No. 25941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

A single issue is raised by this appeal. Does Section 79.480 requiring notice to a city of the 4th class within 90 days for “injuries” growing out of a “defect” or “unsafe” condition of “street, sidewalk or thoroughfare” apply to a claim for property damage arising from a clogged sewer installed under a city street ?

Plaintiff pleaded that the defendant 4th class city negligently permitted a public sewer to “back-up” into the basement of plaintiffs’ home causing property damage. The city filed a motion setting up the failure of plaintiff to comply with Section 79.-480 which reads…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. City of Charleston Ex Rel. Brady v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. David v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Gershon v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Banks v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Lemming v. City of SalisburyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API