McCulley v. City of Princeton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Judge.
A single issue is raised by this appeal. Does Section 79.480 requiring notice to a city of the 4th class within 90 days for “injuries” growing out of a “defect” or “unsafe” condition of “street, sidewalk or thoroughfare” apply to a claim for property damage arising from a clogged sewer installed under a city street ?
Plaintiff pleaded that the defendant 4th class city negligently permitted a public sewer to “back-up” into the basement of plaintiffs’ home causing property damage. The city filed a motion setting up the failure of plaintiff to comply with Section 79.-480 which reads…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glasgow v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- City of Charleston Ex Rel. Brady v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- David v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Gershon v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Banks v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lemming v. City of SalisburyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988