Legal Opinion

Lemming v. City of Salisbury

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1988No. WD40525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COVINGTON, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages from defendant City of Salisbury for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in a fall when plaintiff Anna Lemming slipped and stepped into a hole or opening in a grate located adjacent to the street at the north entrance of the Biltwell Company of Salisbury, Missouri. Plaintiffs alleged five separate acts of negligence on the part of the defendant relative to the allegedly unsafe condition of the grate.

The city filed a motion asserting the failure of the plaintiffs to comply with section 79.480, RSMo 1986, which reads in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Gelhot v. City of Excelsior Springs, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. McCulley v. City of PrincetonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Banks v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Walls v. City of OverlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API