Legal Opinion

David v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 20, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, plaintiff below, filed suit against respondents to recover $25,000 in damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of a fall upon a public sidewalk, at 6058 Kingsbury Avenue, in the city of St. Louis, Missouri. At the close of plaintiff's case the trial court gave, and read to the jury, an instruction, on behalf of each defendant, directing a verdict in their favor. Plaintiff thereupon took an involuntary nonsuit as to both defendants with leave to file a motion to have the same set aside. Plaintiff's motion to have the nonsuit set aside was overruled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Reno v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Dohring v. Kansas City.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Lyons v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Koontz v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, (Consolidated with)Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Glasgow v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Brickell v. KANSAS CITY, MOSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Quinn v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. City of Port Arthur v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API