Lobato v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Kourlis
Although I have great sympathy for the historic and present plight of the landowners in this action, I cannot support the majority opinion for two reasons. First, it is my view that in 1863 Charles Beaubien attempted to make a community grant for the benefit of the inhabitants of the plazas of San Luis, San Pablo, and Los Ballejos. The law in effect at the time did not recognize such a grant and instead required individual identification of grantees. Hence, the Beaubien Document had no legal effect.
*963Second, I find no ambiguity either in the legal description in the Document or in the absence…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- City of Lakewood v. MavromatisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.