Mechanics & Farmers Sav. Bank v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASH 17. — PROSECUTION BY. THE COMMONWEALTH AGAINST THE MECHANICS & FARMERS SAVINGS BANK FOR FAILING TO HAVE PRINTED ON' ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS TPIE WORD “INCORPORATED.” — Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court. W. M. Reed, Circuit Judge. Defendant convicted and appeals1 —
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll
Reversing.
This appeal is prosecuted from a judgmentjagnL--victing the appellant of failing to have'printed on its place of business the word “Incorporated.” The indictment was found under section 576 of the Kentucky Statutes of 1903, reading as follows: “Every corporation organized under the laws of this State, and every corporation doing business in this State, shall, in a conspicuous place on its principal place or places of business, in letters sufficiently large to "be easily read, have painted' or printed the corporate name of such corporation, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sams v. Sams' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Comth. v. Remington Type-writer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Commonwealth v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Sparks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
- Brown v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neutzel v. RyansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Commonwealth v. YungblutCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Meek, Clerk of Circuit Court v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928