State v. Medina
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The Defendant was charged with aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The trial court dismissed the case "with prejudice because it found that the Defendant’s right to a speedy trial had been violated. We reverse because the facts of this case do not implicate the right to a speedy trial. Instead, this is a case of preindictment delay, and since the Defendant failed to show actual and substantial prejudice, and that the State engaged in an intentional delay for tactical purposes, wé reverse the order of dismissal and remand this mat ter…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AcinelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ScherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. ScherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.