Legal Opinion

Sedmak v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1981No. 41378PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of specific performance. We affirm.

In their petition, plaintiffs, Dr. and Mrs. Sedmak (Sedmaks), alleged they entered into a contract with defendant, Charlie’s Chevrolet, Inc. (Charlie’s), to purchase a Corvette automobile for approximately $15,000.00. The Corvette was one of a limited number manufactured to commemorate the selection of the Corvette as the Pace Car for the Indianapolis 500. Charlie’s breached the contract, the Sedmaks alleged, when, after the automobile was delivered, an agent for Charlie’s told the Sedmaks they could not purchase…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Allied Disposal, Inc. v. Bob's Home Service, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Monetti, S.P.A., and Melform U.S.A., Inc. v. Anchor Hocking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Unlimited Equipment Lines, Inc. v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Howard Construction Co. v. Jeff-Cole Quarries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. King Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API