Knecht v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hofstetter, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Christopher James Knecht, filed a pro se complaint with the Court of Claims against defendant-appellee, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, alleging that censorship of his mail caused his First Amendment constitutional rights to be violated. In his complaint, appellant also listed as defendants to his suit George Wilson, Director; William Dallman, Warden; Richard Jones, Major; Tom Metcalfe, Captain; Ron Hart, Institution Inspector; and Larry Haas, Special Agent, Department of United States Treasury. In a pre-screening order, the Court of Claims…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Burkey v. Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Friedman v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- L.A. & D., Inc. v. Board of Lake County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. KeefeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Parsons v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., Unpublished Decision (8-31-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Patterson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
- State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. KeefeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harris v. Grafton Correctional Inst.Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.