Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., Unpublished Decision (8-31-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 2004No. 03AP-772UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Raymond Parsons, appeals from the judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation ("BWC"). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand
{¶ 2} On October 14, 1999, Parsons suffered serious injuries while in the course and scope of his employment. He filed a workers' compensation claim, which the BWC allowed for quadriplegia, complete quadriplegia, neurogenic bladder and neurogenic bowel. The Industrial Commission declared that Parsons was permanently and totally disabled.
{¶ 3} In addition to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Upjohn Co. v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Knecht v. Ohio Department of RehabilitationOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Patterson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
- Harris v. Grafton Correctional Inst.Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
- Davis v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2012
- Doty v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2012
- Drouet v. Bur. of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Claims · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.