Legal Opinion
United States v. Gant
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 2003No. Civil Action 02-2312 (RMU)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Assessing a Civil Penalty Against the Defendant
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff United States brings this action against defendant Gordon Gant, a former Census Bureau employee of the Department of Commerce, for failure to meet his obligation under the Ethics in Government Act (“EIGA”), 5 U.S.C. app. 4 § 101 et seq., to file a financial disclosure report within 30 days of termination of his employment. The matter now before the court is the plaintiffs motion for entry of default judgment. Because…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Credit Lyonnais Securities (Usa), Inc. v. Rafael Alcantara and Cavelba, S.A., Doing Business as Casa De Bolsa Rafael Alcantara V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Niemic v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Highland Park Mezz Lender, LLC v. DonatelliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- United States v. AbbottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- United States v. LairyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. Manigault NewmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.