Legal Opinion

United States v. Manigault Newman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2019-1868Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff V. Civil Case No. 19-1868 (RJL) OMAROSA MANIGAULT NEWMAN, Defendant. a _ A a 4 _ 4 aa ae (d MEMORANDUM OPINION March /S°, 2022 [Dkt. ## 24, 32] In this case, the United States of America (“the Government”) seeks a civil penalty against defendant Omarosa Manigault Newman (“Manigault Newman”) for violating the Ethics In Government Act. Both parties have moved for summary judgment, and briefing is now complete. For the following reasons, Manigault Newman’s motion will be DENIED, and the Government’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Stella, Marie v. v. Mineta, Norman Y.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Jeffrey Lovitky v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API