Legal Opinion
United States v. Lairy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 17, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-2488Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-2488 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 10 : DURWIN LAIRY, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) seeks the inflation-adjusted maximum civil penalty of $60,517 from Defendant Durwin Lairy for failure to submit a termination public financial disclosure report required by the Ethics in Government Act (“EIGA” or “the Act”), 5 U.S.C. app. 4 §§ 101, et…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Adkins v. TeseoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Flynn v. Mastro Masonry ContractorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Carazani v. ZegarraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund v. Kafka Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.