Legal Opinion

Berryhill v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1981No. 21429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant and two codefendants were found guilty of armed robbery and each was sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-three (23) years.

Appellant applied for Post-Conviction Relief and his application was denied after an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed.

Counsel for appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief. . : . I ■! "'pH

During the pendency…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MurrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benedict v. BenedictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API