Celanese Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:
This is a suit for refund of $19,075,994 in income tax, plus interest. The question at issue on these motions is the right of plaintiff, Celanese Corporation, to deduct $58,-364,636 as a bad debt loss, ordinary loss or business expense on its 1969 federal income tax return, as a result of having paid that sum in satisfaction of its guarantees of the debts of an Italian subsidiary corporation during that year.
Statement
Since defendant’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Jean C. Tyler and Dolly Ann Tyler v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leyman Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Celanese Corp. & Consolidated Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985